We were nothing less than thrilled about the performance of the 406ci small-block we built for January's "Old School Meets New" showdown. Faced with a formidable 402ci Gen IV opponent, our mondo-cammed motor matched its high-tech opponent pony for pony, churning out 582.9 hp and 532.7 lb-ft of torque. But even as we celebrated our creation's prodigious power output, we began to wonder if we'd left something on the table. Our peak horsepower number happened at 6,300 rpm, at which point the power curve took an abrupt nosedive. "It's going into valve float," said our dyno guru, Westech's Steve Brul. With that, we decided to see if we could get better control of our 406's valves and moderate the post-peak power drop.

Our first step was to call in some professional help, namely Comp Cams engineer Billy Godbold. We shared our dyno-day observations, and as it turns out, valve float, which indicates loss of lifter contact with the camshaft lobe, isn't really an accurate description of what was happening in our 406's valvetrain. The issues are much more complex than that. We don't have room here for a dissertation on valvetrain dynamics, and fortunately, Godbold was able to give us the info we needed in layman's terms. Better yet, he was able to prescribe a solution, and an effective one at that.

Godbold described the phenomenon we experienced as "a very light valve bounce." Unlike valve float, valve bounce indicates that the valve is not staying seated. "The spring mass itself wasn't enough to hold the valve down," Godbold continued. "The spring starts to surge, so the valve control isn't good. When a spring is having problems controlling its own mass, it doesn't have as much ability to close the valve, and doesn't hold it closed. It can even push the valve open."

Substitute the word "resonance" for "surge," and you've got a quick explanation of our problem. All valvesprings resonate at a certain frequency, and they reach this frequency at a given rpm. Godbold calls this the spring's limit speed, but it isn't necessarily tied to high-rpm antics. "When a spring gets close to the limit speed, it resonates," he told us. "Many people think it happens at high rpm, but it actually happens whenever the spring approaches its limit speed." This resonance, according to Godbold, is a function of both a spring's rate and its mass. "As spring rate goes higher, frequency goes up," he told us. "And as mass goes down, frequency goes up."

Although spring limit speed isn't always tied to high rpm, in this case, our spring's limit speed was close to the engine speed at which our 406 produced peak power-thus the spoon-shaped dip at the end of our dyno runs. What we needed to combat the resonance issue was a lighter spring that also has a higher natural frequency. Godbold figured that a bit of Gen III/IV tech was in order, specifically a set of beehive-style valvesprings, first introduced for the Gen III LS6 powerplant.

"The nature of a beehive spring is that it has a progressive rate," Godbold explained. "Each coil has its own resonance frequency. It's not just magic-there's a reason it works. It's hard to make the whole thing resonate." Remember, however, that resonance is also a function of a spring's weight, as well as its spring rate. Higher spring rate usually leads to a physically heavier spring, but using a beehive spring allowed us to maintain the same spring rate while cutting valvespring and retainer weight in half. "All we did was move the limit speed up, and the limit speed was close to peak power," Godbold summed up. When compared to the "gorilla method," which would have mandated a bigger, heavier spring, this is a finesse approach. We are actually able to obtain better control with less seat load, open load, and spring rate by substantially reducing the mass, thereby increasing the natural frequency. Our post-peak dip is gone, and the thing revs to seven grand without a complaint. Sure, power still drops off after the peak, but not as abruptly-up high, our rev-happy 406 is now making 40-some horsepower more than it did. We'll take it.

Quick Notes

The Mission
Control high-rpm valve instability on a 406ci stroker small-block
The Bottom Line
A set of beehive valvesprings eliminated our post-peak power drain.

Before submitting our Coast High Performance-built 406 stroker to a round of high-rpm dyno testing, we installed a set of Comp Cams Pro Magnum hydraulic-roller lifters. They don't look any different from the regular High Energy lifters, but they're internally designed to perform at higher engine speeds. "The Pro Magnum lifter has less oil volume," Comp's Billy Godbold explained. "The valving and geometry are set up to handle high rpm." These lifters also have a low bleed-down rate and less plunger travel, which means they require a bit more attention when it comes to setting preload. They aren't, however, a cure-all. "They'll solve a lifter issue, not a valve issue," said Godbold. "The lifter was fine; the valve was bouncing." Indeed, Comp's regular-issue handled our 6,500-rpm abuse just fine. Looking to the long run, however, we went for the upgrade. Godbold endorsed our choice: "It's set up to be a very stout lifter. It's really good insurance."

To a certain extent, installing a stiffer valvespring improves valve control and reduces issues like valve bounce. On the other hand, stiffer valvesprings tend to be heavier, and weight is the enemy when it comes to high-performance valvetrains. Heavier springs are harder to control, and are harder on the rest of the valvetrain. Installing beehive valvesprings allowed us to have our cake and eat it too. Our springs had nearly identical seat and open-load figures, but the newfangled beehives weigh nearly half as much, and stayed in control where the traditional coils strayed.

Old Beehive Difference
Spring 114.2g 69.5g -44.7g
Retainer 15.7g 6.0g -9.7g
Total -54.4g
26918-16 Beehive valvesprings
4705-16 Spring seat for 26918 w/0.570-inch guide
788-16 Titanium retainers, 7-degree
648-16 Locks, 7-degree
4753 1.250-inch spring shim kit (if needed)
Displacement 406.0ci
Bore x Stroke 4.155 x 3.750
Rotating assembly Probe forged-steel crank and rods
Pistons Probe forged
Compression 11.1:1
Heads Dart Pro 1 CNC, 227cc
Chamber volume 66cc
Carburetor 825-cfm Mighty Demon
Camshaft Comp Cams hydraulic roller
Valve lift 0.562/0.580 inch, intake/exhaust
w/1.6 rockers 0.600/0.619, intake/exhaust
Duration at 0.050 248/254 degrees, intake/exhaust
Lobe separation 110 degrees
Headers: 131/44-inch Hedman long-tubes
Fuel: 91-octane unleaded
Advance: 37 degrees
Intake manifold: Edelbrock Victor Jr., port-matched
carburetor: 825-cfm Mighty Demon
Jetting: 83 primaries/87 secondaries
Max torque: 529.6 lb-ft at 4,900 rpm
Max power: 574.2 hp at 6,500 rpm
Average torque: 476.5 lb-ft
Average power: 434.1 hp

The point of this exercise was to demonstrate the vastly improved valve control we achieved by switching to beehive valvesprings, as opposed to chasing peak power. Ah, who are we kidding? There was time for a glory run at the end of the day, and this is CHEVY HIGH PERFORMANCE, right? Dyno details are as before, except we bumped the timing up to 39 degrees and fattened up our Mighty Demon mixer with an 85 primary/90 secondary jet combo. Our rev-happy 406 rewarded us with 4 more horsepower and 11 extra pound-feet of torque when compared to our Jan. '07 test, made with a 750-cfm Mighty Demon, with gains shown throughout the powerband. Our old nemesis valve bounce was nowhere to be found.

2,600 392 194
2,700 396 204
2,800 403 215
2,900 412 227
3,000 421 241
3,100 435 257
3,200 451 275
3,300 465 292
3,400 476 308
3,500 484 323
3,600 492 337
3,700 500 352
3,800 506 366
3,900 511 379
4,000 516 393
4,100 520 406
4,200 525 420
4,300 530 434
4,400 535 448
4,500 538 461
4,600 541 473
4,700 542 485
4,800 544 497
4,900 544 508
5,000 544 518
5,100 543 527
5,200 542 536
5,300 540 544
5,400 537 552
5,500 533 558
5,600 529 564
5,700 524 569
5,800 519 574
5,900 514 578
6,000 509 582
6,100 503 584
6,200 496 586
6,300 489 586
6,400 481 586
6,500 473 586
6,600 467 587
6,700 458 585
6,800 444 575
6,900 430 565
7,000 416 555

Average torque 490.4 lb-ft Average power 447.3 hp

Coast High Performance
1650 W. 228th St.
CA  90501
Federal Mogul
26555 Northwestern Hwy.
MI  48034
COMP Cams Powerhouse Products
3402 Democrat Rd.
TN  38118
  • «
  • |
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
  • |
  • 3
  • |
  • View Full Article